Gillibrand Says Working Americans Are “Skipping Meals” Because Of Trump’s “Sky-High Prices” While The President Claims That He “Loves” Inflation

Gillibrand Says Working Americans Are “Skipping Meals” Because Of Trump’s “Sky-High Prices” While The President Claims That He “Loves” Inflation

Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) posted on X on November 2, 2026, stating that working Americans are skipping meals due to high prices and questioning President Donald Trump’s reported comments on inflation.

Gillibrand attached an Independent article on a poll finding Americans forced to skip meals amid rising grocery costs.

The post reads in full:

“Working Americans are skipping meals because of Trump’s sky-high prices.

He said he “loves” inflation? Americans can’t afford food because of it.”

The attached Independent article, published October 28, 2026, reported that half of Americans said they are skipping meals because of rising food prices, according to a Self Financial survey conducted in August. Grocery prices have risen 28 percent from September 2020 to September 2026, with ground beef up 67 percent and coffee up 108 percent, federal data showed.

Respondents said high grocery prices impacted mental health and stress levels more than physical activity, diet, nutrition, or sleep. The article noted multiple polls showing voter frustration with the economy and prices for groceries and gas ahead of the midterms, including a New York Times/Siena survey finding 69 percent disapproval of the cost of living under Trump and 73 percent disapproval of his handling of gas prices.

Gillibrand has repeatedly addressed rising costs under the current administration throughout 2026. In an October 16 post she stated that wholesale inflation had hit a four-year high and that working families cannot afford gas, groceries, or healthcare premiums, adding that Trump was claiming he “loves” inflation instead of ending the war and putting America first.

In mid-October statements she said this year’s Social Security cost-of-living adjustment is not enough to make up for skyrocketing grocery bills, gas prices, and healthcare costs and that she is fighting to pass legislation fixing the inflation formula.

An October 15 post stated that working Americans face higher grocery bills, healthcare premiums, and gas prices because of destructive policies and reckless cuts, and that families are forced to miss debt payments while inflation climbs.

On October 28 she posted that the country faces a cost-of-living crisis made worse by the Iran war and that Republicans had taken away food assistance from children, seniors, and veterans.

In a longer October essay she wrote that New Yorkers have paid over $6,000 more due to the administration’s policies, with gas prices nearly 50 percent higher than before the Iran war and home heating oil up 70 percent.

Her office has released statements documenting additional spending by New York families on housing, groceries, and energy since early 2025 and attributing portions of the increases to tariffs and the Iran conflict. Gillibrand has consistently called for policies to lower costs for working families and has linked the Iran war directly to higher prices at the pump and store.

The November 2 post on skipping meals and the inflation comment continues that focus on the day before the midterm elections.

Hakeem Jeffries Vows “Change Is Coming to the United States Congress” as Democrats Prepare to Challenge Trump’s Republican Majority

House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries issued a brief but pointed election-eve message on Monday, declaring that “Change is coming to the United States Congress.” His statement comes as Democrats seek to overturn Republicans’ narrow House majority and gain greater authority to investigate the Trump administration during the final two years of the president’s term. Jeffries has spent much of Trump’s second term criticizing the administration’s policies and promising increased congressional oversight if Democrats regain control of the House. Jeffries’ full X post reads: “Change is coming to the United States Congress.” 6:34 AM · Nov 2, 2026 The statement follows months of public remarks in which Jeffries has described Trump’s administration as corrupt and argued that congressional Democrats would pursue accountability. In September, Jeffries said a Democratic House majority would focus on lowering living costs, making healthcare affordable and investigating alleged misconduct by the administration.  Jeffries has also repeatedly refused to rule out impeachment proceedings against Trump or members of his administration. He has said that any decision would be guided by evidence, legal standards and the Constitution rather than by a predetermined political outcome. In an August interview, Jeffries said Democrats would seek to hold officials accountable for corruption and extremism if they regained control of the House. He identified the Judiciary and Oversight committees as key bodies for conducting investigations. Jeffries’ October remarks reiterated that position. He said Democrats would follow the facts, apply the law and use constitutional processes to determine whether accountability measures were warranted.  The Democratic leader has also opposed Trump’s Iran war. He has described the conflict as a costly war of choice and argued that the administration’s military decisions have increased gasoline prices and strengthened Iran’s position. His criticism has included calls for congressional oversight of the war and the administration’s foreign policy.

Read More »

Warner Accuses Trump of “Raking in Billions” as Americans Face Rising Gas and Housing Costs — “His Reckless Policies Are Making Him Richer”

Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia accused President Donald Trump of benefiting financially from his administration’s policies while American families face higher living costs, renewing a criticism that has become increasingly focused on the president’s investments in oil and gas companies during the war with Iran. Warner’s November 2 statement argues that rising expenses for households are occurring alongside significant increases in Trump’s personal wealth. The senator’s criticism comes one day before the midterm elections, with affordability and the economic consequences of the Iran war among the central issues facing voters. Warner’s full X post reads: “Since Trump took office, gas prices, housing costs, and everyday expenses have skyrocketed. American families are paying more just to get by, but Trump is raking in billions. The president’s reckless policies are making him richer while costing Americans more.” 11:04 AM · Nov 2, 2026 Warner’s reference to gas prices reflects his repeated criticism of Trump’s decision to launch military operations against Iran. In March, Warner delivered a Senate floor speech warning that the conflict had disrupted global energy supplies and contributed to rising fuel prices. He described the war as a conflict without a clear endgame.  Warner has also criticized the administration’s shifting explanations for the war. In April, he said the White House had failed to provide a consistent justification and had not adequately planned for the consequences of the conflict, including rising prices for diesel, fertilizer and other essential goods.  His criticism of Trump’s personal wealth became more specific in October. On October 27, Warner and Sen. Tim Kaine issued a statement highlighting a Joint Economic Committee report that estimated Trump’s oil and gas stock holdings had increased to as much as $81.6 million. The committee estimated that his oil and gas stock wealth had increased by up to $35.8 million during 2026.  The Joint Economic Committee report also estimated that Americans had spent an additional $101 billion on gasoline since the beginning of the Iran war, averaging approximately $856 in added costs per family. These are committee estimates based on its analysis of energy prices and Trump’s financial disclosures. 

Read More »

Warren Says Americans Are Ready to Take Country Back From “Billionaires” and Trump’s “Corruption” — Calls for a Country That Works for “Working People”

Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts called on Americans to reclaim political power from wealthy interests and the Trump administration on Monday, framing the November 3 midterm elections as an opportunity to build a government that prioritizes working people. Warren’s statement reflects a longstanding focus on economic inequality, corporate influence and alleged conflicts of interest involving the president and his business interests. The Democratic senator has repeatedly criticized Trump’s financial dealings and argued that wealthy individuals and corporations have gained influence over federal policymaking. Warren’s full X post reads: “The American people are ready to take our country back from the billionaires, from Donald Trump’s corruption, and to build a country that finally works for working people. Let’s make the message loud and clear on November 3.” 10:27 AM · Nov 2, 2026 Warren’s reference to billionaires reflects her longstanding advocacy for policies aimed at reducing economic inequality and limiting the political influence of wealthy donors. Her work in the Senate has included proposals involving taxation, financial regulation and corporate accountability. Her criticism of Trump has also centered on alleged conflicts of interest. In May, Warren’s Senate Banking Committee minority staff released a report examining Trump’s diplomatic visit to China and the financial interests of the president, his family and billionaire allies. Warren described the visit as benefiting wealthy interests rather than American workers and families.  Warren and Rep. Robert Garcia also pressed Trump in August over financial disclosures showing thousands of stock trades during his presidency. Their letter raised questions about whether government actions could affect the value of Trump’s investments. The lawmakers cited more than 17,000 trades worth up to $1.56 billion.  Warren’s concerns about financial conflicts have extended to cryptocurrency. She has criticized Trump-linked cryptocurrency ventures and questioned whether the president’s personal business interests could influence federal policy. Her position has consistently focused on the potential for public office to be used for private financial gain. 

Read More »