Trump Vows to Shield Elon Musk if Democrats Launch Investigations After Midterms as the Billionaire Pours Nearly Half a Billion Dollars Into the Midterms — Suggests He Could Issue Pre-Emptive Pardons

Trump Vows to Shield Elon Musk if Democrats Launch Investigations After Midterms as the Billionaire Pours Nearly Half a Billion Dollars Into the Midterms — Suggests He Could Issue Pre-Emptive Pardons

President Donald Trump said Monday that he would move to protect Elon Musk if Democrats investigate the SpaceX and Tesla chief executive after the midterm elections, and he suggested he could issue pre-emptive pardons for staff and others around him if Democrats pursue them. The remarks came one day before voters head to the polls in an election in which Musk has spent heavily to help Republicans retain control of Congress.

The comments were first reported by Axios. Trump made them in an interview for the “Pod Force One” podcast, hosted by New York Post columnist Miranda Devine, that was published early Monday.

What Trump Said

Devine asked the president about rumors that Musk could face an investigation or have assets seized. “It’s talk. But if it is talk, we’ll have to protect them,” Trump said.

Trump also made clear he would consider pardons for his own staff and allies if Democrats target them. “I would if I needed to. Sure,” he said. “I would not even think about it. I’d do it,” he added.

On a possible third term, Trump said he would love to run again but that “the language is very exacting.” While seemingly closing that door, he suggested there was still time to advance his agenda. “You know, we have more than two years left. That’s a long time. You can do a lot in that period of time,” he said.

Musk’s Midterm Spending

The Axios report states that Musk has spent nearly half a billion dollars opposing Democrats during this election cycle. It adds that he recently suggested it would be the end of democracy if Democrats win the White House and Congress in 2028.

Reuters reported in mid-October that Musk had spent roughly $366 million in the 2026 cycle, including $276 million since July. A spokesman for his super PAC, America PAC, confirmed the figures.

Of the $276 million donated since July, $158 million went to the Senate Leadership Fund, the super PAC aligned with Senate Majority Leader John Thune. Another $76 million went to Musk’s own America PAC, and $20 million went to the Congressional Leadership Fund, which is aligned with House Speaker Mike Johnson.

The Republican Governors Association received $10 million, as did the Lone Star Liberty PAC, which backs Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton’s U.S. Senate bid. The Republican Attorneys General Association received $2 million. Reuters also reported that Musk has given additional money through groups that do not disclose their donors, and that he spent roughly $290 million in the previous election cycle.

Background

In late July, reports indicated that Musk had authorized America PAC to spend between $100 million and $120 million on a get-out-the-vote program across at least eight states. “We’re excited to again be part of the team,” America PAC spokesperson Andrew Romeo said in a statement at the time.

The relationship between Trump and Musk has shifted considerably since Musk left the administration in 2025. In June 2025, in the first episode of the same podcast, Trump said, “Look, I have no hard feelings,” when discussing the breakdown of their alliance.

Musk later resumed political giving, including $5 million donations to the main super PACs backing House and Senate Republicans and $5 million to Trump’s MAGA Inc.

Why It Matters

Axios reported that Trump is positioning himself for a combative final two years in office as polls increasingly point to the prospect of a significant Democratic wave. Reuters has likewise reported that Democrats’ chances of retaking the House and Senate have improved, even as Musk’s spending has grown.

Midterm elections are scheduled for Tuesday, November 3. If Democrats win control of either chamber, they would gain the authority to open investigations and issue subpoenas, which is the scenario Trump was asked about in the interview.

Kelly Says Trump Started Iran War With No Congressional Approval, “No Strategic Goal, No Plan, No Timeline” — Eight Months Later And “Americans Can Barely Afford Their Lives”

Sen. Mark Kelly of Arizona renewed his criticism of President Donald Trump’s war with Iran on Monday, November 2, arguing that the conflict has continued for eight months without a clear explanation of its objectives or an established timeline for ending it. The Democratic senator linked the administration’s military decisions to the rising cost of living, saying Americans are struggling financially while the White House has failed to explain what the war was intended to accomplish. Kelly’s latest statement reflects a position he has maintained throughout the conflict, including repeated criticism of the administration’s lack of strategic planning, its decision to initiate hostilities without congressional authorization and the potential consequences for American servicemembers and national security. Kelly’s full X post reads: “It’s been eight months since Trump bypassed Congress and started a war with Iran. Prices are still rising, Americans can barely afford their lives, and this Administration still can’t explain what this was supposed to achieve or when it will end.” 10:55 AM · Nov 2, 2026 The senator’s reference to Congress concerns the constitutional division of war powers. Article I of the Constitution grants Congress the authority to declare war, while the president serves as commander in chief. Kelly has argued that the administration should have sought congressional authorization for offensive military operations against Iran. On June 27, 2025, Kelly voted in favor of a War Powers Resolution led by Sen. Tim Kaine that sought to direct the removal of U.S. forces from unauthorized hostilities against Iran. Kelly said the American people and servicemembers deserved a genuine debate before the country entered a war.  Kelly’s position became more pronounced after the conflict began in February 2026. In March, he warned that the administration lacked a clear objective, timeline, end state or exit strategy. He raised the issue during Senate intelligence hearings, questioning officials about what Trump knew before the conflict escalated.  On March 4, Kelly also warned that the absence of a defined goal and timeline could place additional American servicemembers at risk. His criticism centered on the potential for an extended conflict without a clear strategic endpoint.  The senator reiterated those concerns in an April 15 Senate floor speech, stating that the United States and Israel were fighting Iran without a clear strategy or goal. Kelly also distinguished his opposition to the war from his support for Israel’s security and right to exist. 

Read More »